Asta e ultimul. Observati cine e inainte si dupa Romania. Datoria intrarii in CE totusi, de pe locul 84 pe 69. Insa asta nu inseamna mare lucru. Nici America, pe locul 20 nu e mai breaza.
dar totusi…
( a nu se confunda, pe primul loc e cea mai necorupta tara din lume)
Sursa: http://www.transparency.org/
| country rank |
country | 2007 CPI score |
surveys used |
confidence range |
| 1 | Denmark | 9.4 | 6 | 9.2 – 9.6 |
| 1 | Finland | 9.4 | 6 | 9.2 – 9.6 |
| 1 | New Zealand | 9.4 | 6 | 9.2 – 9.6 |
| 4 | Singapore | 9.3 | 9 | 9.0 – 9.5 |
| 4 | Sweden | 9.3 | 6 | 9.1 – 9.4 |
| 6 | Iceland | 9.2 | 6 | 8.3 – 9.6 |
| 7 | Netherlands | 9.0 | 6 | 8.8 – 9.2 |
| 7 | Switzerland | 9.0 | 6 | 8.8 – 9.2 |
| 9 | Canada | 8.7 | 6 | 8.3 – 9.1 |
| 9 | Norway | 8.7 | 6 | 8.0 – 9.2 |
| 11 | Australia | 8.6 | 8 | 8.1 – 9.0 |
| 12 | Luxembourg | 8.4 | 5 | 7.7 – 8.7 |
| 12 | United Kingdom | 8.4 | 6 | 7.9 – 8.9 |
| 14 | Hong Kong | 8.3 | 8 | 7.6 – 8.8 |
| 15 | Austria | 8.1 | 6 | 7.5 – 8.7 |
| 16 | Germany | 7.8 | 6 | 7.3 – 8.4 |
| 17 | Ireland | 7.5 | 6 | 7.3 – 7.7 |
| 17 | Japan | 7.5 | 8 | 7.1 – 8.0 |
| 19 | France | 7.3 | 6 | 6.9 – 7.8 |
| 20 | USA | 7.2 | 8 | 6.5 – 7.6 |
| 21 | Belgium | 7.1 | 6 | 7.1 – 7.1 |
| 22 | Chile | 7.0 | 7 | 6.5 – 7.4 |
| 23 | Barbados | 6.9 | 4 | 6.6 – 7.1 |
| 24 | Saint Lucia | 6.8 | 3 | 6.1 – 7.1 |
| 25 | Spain | 6.7 | 6 | 6.2 – 7.0 |
| 25 | Uruguay | 6.7 | 5 | 6.4 – 7.0 |
| 27 | Slovenia | 6.6 | 8 | 6.1 – 6.9 |
| 28 | Estonia | 6.5 | 8 | 6.0 -7.0 |
| 28 | Portugal | 6.5 | 6 | 5.8 – 7.2 |
| 30 | Israel | 6.1 | 6 | 5.6 – 6.7 |
| 30 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
6.1 | 3 | 4.0 – 7.1 |
| 32 | Qatar | 6.0 | 4 | 5.4 – 6.4 |
| 33 | Malta | 5.8 | 4 | 5.3 – 6.2 |
| 34 | Macao | 5.7 | 4 | 4.7 – 6.4 |
| 34 | Taiwan | 5.7 | 9 | 5.4 – 6.1 |
| 34 | United Arab Emirates | 5.7 | 5 | 4.8 – 6.5 |
| 37 | Dominica | 5.6 | 3 | 4.0 – 6.1 |
| 38 | Botswana | 5.4 | 7 | 4.8 – 6.1 |
| 39 | Cyprus | 5.3 | 3 | 5.1 – 5.5 |
| 39 | Hungary | 5.3 | 8 | 4.9 – 5.5 |
| 41 | Czech Republik | 5.2 | 8 | 4.9 – 5.8 |
| 41 | Italy | 5.2 | 6 | 4.7 – 5.7 |
| 43 | Malaysia | 5.1 | 9 | 4.5 – 5.7 |
| 43 | South Africa | 5.1 | 9 | 4.9 – 5.5 |
| 43 | South Korea | 5.1 | 9 | 4.7 – 5.5 |
| 46 | Bahrain | 5.0 | 5 | 4.2 – 5.7 |
| 46 | Bhutan | 5.0 | 5 | 4.1 – 5.7 |
| 46 | Costa Rica | 5.0 | 5 | 4.7 – 5.3 |
| 49 | Cape Verde | 4.9 | 3 | 3.4 – 5.5 |
| 49 | Slovakia | 4.9 | 8 | 4.5 – 5.2 |
| 51 | Latvia | 4.8 | 6 | 4.4 – 5.1 |
| 51 | Lithuania | 4.8 | 7 | 4.4 – 5.3 |
| 53 | Jordan | 4.7 | 7 | 3.8 – 5.6 |
| 53 | Mauritius | 4.7 | 6 | 4.1 – 5.7 |
| 53 | Oman | 4.7 | 4 | 3.9 – 5.3 |
| 56 | Greece | 4.6 | 6 | 4.3 – 5.0 |
| 57 | Namibia | 4.5 | 7 | 3.9 – 5.2 |
| 57 | Samoa | 4.5 | 3 | 3.4 – 5.5 |
| 57 | Seychelles | 4.5 | 4 | 2.9 – 5.7 |
| 60 | Kuweit | 4.3 | 5 | 3.3 – 5.1 |
| 61 | Cuba | 4.2 | 4 | 3.5 – 4.7 |
| 61 | Poland | 4.2 | 8 | 3.6 – 4.9 |
| 61 | Tunesia | 4.2 | 6 | 3.4 – 4.8 |
| 64 | Bulgaria | 4.1 | 8 | 3.6 – 4.8 |
| 64 | Croatia | 4.1 | 8 | 3.6 – 4.5 |
| 64 | Turkey | 4.1 | 7 | 3.8 – 4.5 |
| 67 | El Salvador | 4.0 | 5 | 3.2 – 4.6 |
| 68 | Colombia | 3.8 | 7 | 3.4 – 4.3 |
| 69 | Ghana | 3.7 | 7 | 3.5 – 3.9 |
| 69 | Romania | 3.7 | 8 | 3.4 – 4.1 |
| 71 | Senegal | 3.6 | 7 | 3.2 – 4.2 |
| 72 | Brazil | 3.5 | 7 | 3.2 – 4.0 |
| 72 | China | 3.5 | 9 | 3.0 – 4.2 |
| 72 | India | 3.5 | 10 | 3.3 – 3.7 |
| 72 | Mexico | 3.5 | 7 | 3.3 – 3.8 |
| 72 | Morocco | 3.5 | 7 | 3.0 – 4.2 |
| 72 | Peru | 3.5 | 5 | 3.4 – 3.7 |
| 72 | Suriname | 3.5 | 4 | 3.0 – 3.9 |
| 79 | Georgia | 3.4 | 6 | 2.9 – 4.3 |
| 79 | Grenada | 3.4 | 3 | 2.0 – 4.1 |
| 79 | Saudi Arabia | 3.4 | 4 | 2.7 – 3.9 |
| 79 | Serbia | 3.4 | 6 | 3.0 – 4.0 |
| 79 | Trinidad and Tobago | 3.4 | 4 | 2.7 – 3.9 |
| 84 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 3.3 | 7 | 2.9 – 3.7 |
| 84 | Gabon | 3.3 | 5 | 3.0 – 3.5 |
| 84 | Jamaica | 3.3 | 5 | 3.1 – 3.4 |
| 84 | Kiribati | 3.3 | 3 | 2.4 – 3.9 |
| 84 | Lesotho | 3.3 | 6 | 3.1 – 3.5 |
| 84 | FYR Macedonia | 3.3 | 6 | 2.9 – 3.8 |
| 84 | Maldives | 3.3 | 4 | 2.3 – 4.3 |
| 84 | Montenegro | 3.3 | 4 | 2.4 – 4.0 |
| 84 | Swaziland | 3.3 | 5 | 2.6 – 4.2 |
| 84 | Thailand | 3.3 | 9 | 2.9 – 3.7 |
| 94 | Madagascar | 3.2 | 7 | 2.5 – 3.9 |
| 94 | Panama | 3.2 | 5 | 2.8 – 3.5 |
| 94 | Sri Lanka | 3.2 | 7 | 2.9 – 3.4 |
| 94 | Tanzania | 3.2 | 8 | 2.9 – 3.4 |
| 98 | Vanuatu | 3.1 | 3 | 2.4 – 3.7 |
| 99 | Algeria | 3.0 | 6 | 2.7 – 3.2 |
| 99 | Armenia | 3.0 | 7 | 2.8 – 3.2 |
| 99 | Belize | 3.0 | 3 | 2.0 – 3.7 |
| 99 | Dominican Republic | 3.0 | 5 | 2.8 – 3.3 |
| 99 | Lebanon | 3.0 | 4 | 2.2 – 3.6 |
| 99 | Mongolia | 3.0 | 6 | 2.6 – 3.3 |
| 105 | Albania | 2.9 | 6 | 2.6 – 3.1 |
| 105 | Argentina | 2.9 | 7 | 2.6 – 3.2 |
| 105 | Bolivia | 2.9 | 6 | 2.7 – 3.2 |
| 105 | Burkina Faso | 2.9 | 7 | 2.6 – 3.4 |
| 105 | Djibouti | 2.9 | 3 | 2.2 – 3.4 |
| 105 | Egypt | 2.9 | 7 | 2.6 – 3.3 |
| 111 | Eritrea | 2.8 | 5 | 2.1 – 3.5 |
| 111 | Guatemala | 2.8 | 5 | 2.4 – 3.2 |
| 111 | Moldovaa | 2.8 | 7 | 2.5 – 3.3 |
| 111 | Mozambique | 2.8 | 8 | 2.5 – 3.1 |
| 111 | Rwanda | 2.8 | 5 | 2.3 – 3.3 |
| 111 | Solomon Islands | 2.8 | 3 | 2.4 – 3.1 |
| 111 | Uganda | 2.8 | 8 | 2.5 – 3.0 |
| 118 | Benin | 2.7 | 7 | 2.3 – 3.2 |
| 118 | Malawi | 2.7 | 8 | 2.4 – 3.0 |
| 118 | Mali | 2.7 | 8 | 2.4 – 3.0 |
| 118 | Sao Tome and Principe | 2.7 | 3 | 2.4 – 3.0 |
| 118 | Ukraine | 2.7 | 7 | 2.4 – 3.0 |
| 123 | Comoros | 2.6 | 3 | 2.2 – 3.0 |
| 123 | Guyana | 2.6 | 4 | 2.3 – 2.7 |
| 123 | Mauritania | 2.6 | 6 | 2.0 – 3.3 |
| 123 | Nicaragua | 2.6 | 6 | 2.3 – 2.7 |
| 123 | Niger | 2.6 | 7 | 2.3 – 2.9 |
| 123 | Timor-Leste | 2.6 | 3 | 2.5 – 2.6 |
| 123 | Viet Nam | 2.6 | 9 | 2.4 – 2.9 |
| 123 | Zambia | 2.6 | 8 | 2.3 – 2.9 |
| 131 | Burundi | 2.5 | 7 | 2.0 – 3.0 |
| 131 | Honduras | 2.5 | 6 | 2.3 – 2.6 |
| 131 | Iran | 2.5 | 4 | 2.0 – 3.0 |
| 131 | Libya | 2.5 | 4 | 2.1 – 2.6 |
| 131 | Nepal | 2.5 | 7 | 2.3 – 2.7 |
| 131 | Phillipines | 2.5 | 9 | 2.3 – 2.7 |
| 131 | Yemen | 2.5 | 5 | 2.1 – 3.0 |
| 138 | Cameroon | 2.4 | 8 | 2.1 – 2.7 |
| 138 | Ethiopia | 2.4 | 8 | 2.1 – 2.7 |
| 138 | Pakistan | 2.4 | 7 | 2.0 – 2.8 |
| 138 | Paraguay | 2.4 | 5 | 2.1 – 2.6 |
| 138 | Syria | 2.4 | 4 | 1.7 – 2.9 |
| 143 | Gambia | 2.3 | 6 | 2.0 – 2.6 |
| 143 | Indonesia | 2.3 | 11 | 2.1 – 2.4 |
| 143 | Russia | 2.3 | 8 | 2.1 – 2.6 |
| 143 | Togo | 2.3 | 5 | 1.9 – 2.8 |
| 147 | Angola | 2.2 | 7 | 1.8 – 2.4 |
| 147 | Guinea-Bissau | 2.2 | 3 | 2.0 – 2.3 |
| 147 | Nigeria | 2.2 | 8 | 2.0 – 2.4 |
| 150 | Azerbaijan | 2.1 | 8 | 1.9 – 2.3 |
| 150 | Belarus | 2.1 | 5 | 1.7 – 2.6 |
| 150 | Congo, Republic | 2.1 | 6 | 2.0 – 2.2 |
| 150 | Cote d’Ivoire | 2.1 | 6 | 1.7 – 2.6 |
| 150 | Ecuador | 2.1 | 5 | 2.0 – 2.3 |
| 150 | Kazakhstan | 2.1 | 6 | 1.7 – 2.5 |
| 150 | Kenya | 2.1 | 8 | 1.9 – 2.3 |
| 150 | Kyrgyzstan | 2.1 | 7 | 2.0 – 2.2 |
| 150 | Liberia | 2.1 | 4 | 1.8 – 2.4 |
| 150 | Sierra Leone | 2.1 | 5 | 2.0 – 2.2 |
| 150 | Tajikistan | 2.1 | 8 | 1.9 – 2.3 |
| 150 | Zimbabwe | 2.1 | 8 | 1.8 – 2.4 |
| 162 | Bangladesh | 2.0 | 7 | 1.8 – 2.3 |
| 162 | Cambodia | 2.0 | 7 | 1.8 – 2.1 |
| 162 | Central African Republic | 2.0 | 5 | 1.8 – 2.3 |
| 162 | Papua New Guinea | 2.0 | 6 | 1.7 – 2.3 |
| 162 | Turkmenistan | 2.0 | 5 | 1.8 – 2.3 |
| 162 | Venezuela | 2.0 | 7 | 1.9 – 2.1 |
| 168 | Congo, Democratic Republic | 1.9 | 6 | 1.8 – 2.1 |
| 168 | Equatorial Guinea | 1.9 | 4 | 1.7 – 2.0 |
| 168 | Guinea | 1.9 | 6 | 1.4 – 2.6 |
| 168 | Laos | 1.9 | 6 | 1.7 – 2.2 |
| 172 | Afghanistan | 1.8 | 4 | 1.4 – 2.0 |
| 172 | Chad | 1.8 | 7 | 1.7 – 1.9 |
| 172 | Sudan | 1.8 | 6 | 1.6 – 1.9 |
| 175 | Tonga | 1.7 | 3 | 1.5 – 1.8 |
| 175 | Uzbekistan | 1.7 | 7 | 1.6 – 1.9 |
| 177 | Haiti | 1.6 | 4 | 1.3 – 1.8 |
| 178 | Iraq | 1.5 | 4 | 1.3 – 1.7 |
| 179 | Myanmar | 1.4 | 4 | 1.1 – 1.7 |
| 179 | Somalia | 1.4 | 4 | 1.1 – 1.7 |
Explanatory notes*
* CPI Score relates to perceptions of the degree of corruption as seen by business people and country analysts, and ranges between 10 (highly clean) and 0 (highly corrupt).
** Confidence range provides a range of possible values of the CPI score. This reflects how a country’s score may vary, depending on measurement precision. Nominally, with 5 percent probability the score is above this range and with another 5 percent it is below. However, particularly when only few sources are available, an unbiased estimate of the mean coverage probability is lower than the nominal value of 90%.
*** Surveys used refers to the number of surveys that assessed a country’s performance. 14 surveys and expert assessments were used and at least 3 were required for a country to be included in the CPI.
————————————-
2006
The 2006 Corruption Perceptions Index ranks 163 countries on a scale of zero (highly corrupt) to 10 (highly clean) based on a composite index of polls from experts and business sources.
Jointly sharing the number one clean list rank this year are Finland, Iceland and New Zealand which each have a score of 9.6.
Denmark, Singapore, Sweden and Switzerland are ranked as the fourth to seventh cleanest nations.
Worst ranked for corruption is Haiti with just 1.8 points. It is followed by Iraq, Guinea and Myanmar which share the penultimate slot with a score of 1.9.
Bangladesh, Chad, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Sudan are jointly ranked as the third most corrupt states.
The index reveals a strong correlation between corruption and poverty, with a concentration of impoverished states at the bottom of the ranking, said a TI statement.
‘Corruption traps millions in poverty,’ said TI chair Huguette Labelle, adding: ‘Despite a decade of progress in establishing anti-corruption laws and regulations, today’s results indicate that much remains to be done.’
All low-income countries and all but two African states score below five points, meaning they face serious perceived levels of domestic corruption.
Botswana is the cleanest ranked African state in 37th place on the list, with South Africa (51st place) and Namibia (55th place) in the upper third. Nigeria is among the worst-ranked states at place 142.
Among the major world powers, Germany was ranked 16th, Japan 17th, France 18th, the United States was in 20th place (tied with Chile and Belgium), Brazil, China and India were tied at 70th place and Russia was 121st.
The rankings of Romania and Bulgaria – which are both due to join the European Union on January 1, 2007 – do not correspond with the common view in Brussels that Bulgaria has more corruption problems.
TI’s index puts Bulgaria in 57th place while giving Romania a worse corruption perceptions ranking at 84th place.
Countries with a significant worsening of corruption include: Brazil, Cuba, Israel, Jordan, Laos, Seychelles, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia and the US, said the report.
Countries with a significant reduction in perceived levels of corruption include: Algeria, Czech Republic, India, Japan, Latvia, Lebanon, Mauritius, Paraguay, Slovenia, Turkey, Turkmenistan and Uruguay.
TI’s corruption perceptions index focuses on the public sector and defines corruption as ‘the abuse of public office for private gain.’
Several countries previously covered in survey have been dropped this year due to lack of sufficient data, said TI. These include Afghanistan, Palestine and Somalia.
The report’s methodology has changed slightly in that it now only uses data from the past two years and not three years as it used to do.
Among the index’s sources are surveys by the World Bank, the Economist Intelligence Unit and the US-based non-government organization Freedom House.
© 2006 dpa – Deutsche Presse-Agentur


















septembrie 26, 2007 at 6:43 pm
nordul rulează. păcat că e frig…
septembrie 27, 2007 at 1:53 am
chiar ma gandeam unde sa ma mut… dar, vorba anei, este cam frig pe acolo. nu-i nimic, ma imbrac bine!
septembrie 27, 2007 at 11:05 am
Dar sint tari scumpe !!!!!
si barbatii sint cam beti tot timpul.
septembrie 27, 2007 at 1:48 pm
bărbaţii şi femeile se îmbată în tandem… e scump ce e bun, asta e: carne de ren afumată, yummie (stockholm). m-am simţit foaaarte în largul meu, venea lumea să mă întrebe unde s-a mutat staţia autobuzului 23 B
septembrie 27, 2007 at 2:20 pm
Ce mi-e 69 ce mi-e 179, tot căcatul ăla e. Corupţia e la mama ei acasă. Dar a naibii s-a întipărit foarte bine în sângele românului, parcă ţi-e şi jenă să te duci la medic (de ex) fără un “cadou”. Ce mai e de făcut ca să scăpăm de ea? Eradicăm populaţia Terrei (aşa scăpăm şi de poluare şi de noi).
Ahhh, nordul…… Dacă nu mă înşel, oamenii ăia nu sunt atât de primitori cu străinii care vor să se stabilească la ei în ţară. Acolo e altă lume (poate chiar paralelă cu asta în care trăim noi).
septembrie 27, 2007 at 3:15 pm
cred ca pana la urma ma convingeti, cu toate ca nordicii sunt printre cei mai depresivi din lume. asa ca, va trebui sa ma inarmez atat cu multe haine groase, cat si cu multe antidepresive. tot trebuie sa fie mai bine deat… sa-ti fie jena ca te duci la doctor fara “drept”. si nu numai jena, dar si frica – nu stii cum ii scapa bisturiul din gresala pe organul sanatos…
septembrie 27, 2007 at 7:15 pm
În caz că nu ştiaţi (ceea ce mă îndoiesc
) frigul te menţine tânăr. (au fost prezentate pe la tv cazuri în care unii dormeau în frigider pt a încetini procesul de îmbătrânire a pielii/corpului)
Bărbaţii sunt beţi cam tot timpul şi în Românica noastră dragă şi scumpă
septembrie 28, 2007 at 12:05 am
mis mahmur si vreau sa va pup pe toti in cur. de dragul coruptiei.
septembrie 28, 2007 at 12:58 am
8, not me, balaure… ma place rau ciripoiul asta, ce sa fac?
cine stie pe unde mai comenteaza in numele meu…
*
asta cu frigiderul este chiar ceva… nebuna-i lumea.
septembrie 29, 2007 at 10:27 am
În ton cu subiectul http://realiatealuipetria.blogspot.com/2007/09/jurnalul-unui-closet.html …
ianuarie 15, 2008 at 9:10 pm
Nu am încredere într-un astfel de top care spune că Singapore este o ţară mai puţin coruptă decât Suedia.
ianuarie 16, 2008 at 5:44 am
bre, sint ambele pe locul 4 adica sint la egalitate.
februarie 7, 2008 at 10:06 pm
dacă vrei, poti corecta titlul “topul corupriei” (da că a fost mistyping) în “topul coruptiei”: intri la edit post si în coloana din dreapta, la “post slug” poti rescrie titlul.
februarie 7, 2008 at 10:10 pm
thanks
februarie 7, 2008 at 10:10 pm
aaa, titlul postului e corect, acuma vad:) titlul linkului l-ai scris mistyped.
februarie 7, 2008 at 10:12 pm
am corectat thanks